This article is about the use and knowledge of tools. For other uses, see Technology (disambiguation).
For more details on this topic, see Productivity improving technologies (historical).
Technology (from Greek τέχνη, techne, "art, skill, cunning of hand"; and -λογία, -logia[1])
is the collection of techniques, methods or processes used in the
production of goods or services or in the accomplishment of objectives,
such as scientific investigation. Technology can be the knowledge of
techniques, processes, etc. or it can be embedded in machines,
computers, devices and factories, which can be operated by individuals
without detailed knowledge of the workings of such things.
The human species' use of technology began with the conversion of natural resources into simple tools. The prehistoricdiscovery of how to control fire increased the available sources of food and the invention of the wheel helped humans in travelling in and controlling their environment. Recent technological developments, including the printing press, thetelephone, and the Internet, have lessened physical barriers to communication and
allowed humans to interact freely on a global scale. However, not all
technology has been used for peaceful purposes; the development of weapons of ever-increasing destructive power has progressed throughout history, from clubs to nuclear weapons.
Technology has affected society and its surroundings in a number of ways. In many societies, technology has helped develop more advanced economies (including today's global economy) and has allowed the rise of a leisure class. Many technological processes produce unwanted by-products, known as pollution, and deplete natural resources, to the detriment of Earth'senvironment. Various implementations of technology influence the values of a society and new technology often raises new ethical questions. Examples include the rise of the notion of efficiency in terms of human productivity, a term originally applied only to machines, and the challenge of traditional norms.
Philosophical debates have arisen over the present and future use of
technology in society, with disagreements over whether technology
improves the human condition or worsens it. Neo-Luddism, anarcho-primitivism,
and similar movements criticise the pervasiveness of technology in the
modern world, opining that it harms the environment and alienates
people; proponents of ideologies such as transhumanism and techno-progressivism view
continued technological progress as beneficial to society and the human
condition. Indeed, until recently, it was believed that the development
of technology was restricted only to human beings, but recent
scientific studies indicate that other primates and certain dolphin communities have developed simple tools and learned to pass their knowledge to other generations.
Contents
[hide]§Definition and usage
The use of the term "technology" has changed significantly over the last
200 years. Before the 20th century, the term was uncommon in English,
and usually referred to the description or study of the useful arts.[2] The term was often connected to technical education, as in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (chartered in 1861).[3]
The term "technology" rose to prominence in the 20th century in connection with the Second Industrial Revolution. The term's meanings changed in the early 20th century when American social scientists, beginning with Thorstein Veblen, translated ideas from the German concept of Technik into "technology". In German and other European languages, a distinction exists between technikand technologie that
is absent in English, which usually translates both terms as
"technology". By the 1930s, "technology" referred not only to the study of the industrial arts but to the industrial arts themselves.[4]
In 1937, the American sociologist Read Bain wrote that "technology
includes all tools, machines, utensils, weapons, instruments, housing,
clothing, communicating and transporting devices and the skills by which
we produce and use them."[5] Bain's
definition remains common among scholars today, especially social
scientists. But equally prominent is the definition of technology as
applied science, especially among scientists and engineers, although
most social scientists who study technology reject this definition.[6] More
recently, scholars have borrowed from European philosophers of
"technique" to extend the meaning of technology to various forms of
instrumental reason, as in Foucault's work on technologies of the self (techniques de soi).
Dictionaries and scholars have offered a variety of definitions. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary offers
a definition of the term: "the practical application of knowledge
especially in a particular area" and "a capability given by the
practical application of knowledge".[7]Ursula Franklin,
in her 1989 "Real World of Technology" lecture, gave another definition
of the concept; it is "practice, the way we do things around here".[8] The term is often used to imply a specific field of technology, or to refer to high technology or just consumer electronics, rather than technology as a whole.[9] Bernard Stiegler, in Technics and Time, 1, defines technology in two ways: as "the pursuit of life by means other than life", and as "organized inorganic matter."[10]
Technology can be most broadly defined as the entities, both material
and immaterial, created by the application of mental and physical effort
in order to achieve some value. In this usage, technology refers to
tools and machines that may be used to solve real-world problems. It is a
far-reaching term that may include simple tools, such as a crowbar or wooden spoon, or more complex machines, such as a space station or particle accelerator. Tools and machines need not be material; virtual technology, such as computer software and business methods, fall under this definition of technology.[11] W. Brian Arthur defines technology in a similarly broad way as "a means to fulfill a human purpose".[12]
The word "technology" can also be used to refer to a collection of
techniques. In this context, it is the current state of humanity's
knowledge of how to combine resources to produce desired products, to
solve problems, fulfill needs, or satisfy wants; it includes technical
methods, skills, processes, techniques, tools and raw materials. When
combined with another term, such as "medical technology" or "space
technology", it refers to the state of the respective field's knowledge
and tools. "State-of-the-art technology" refers to the high technology available to humanity in any field.
Technology can be viewed as an activity that forms or changes culture.[13] Additionally,
technology is the application of math, science, and the arts for the
benefit of life as it is known. A modern example is the rise of communication technology, which has lessened barriers to human interaction and, as a result, has helped spawn new subcultures; the rise of cyberculture has, at its basis, the development of the Internet and the computer.[14] Not all technology enhances culture in a creative way; technology can also help facilitate political oppression and war via tools such as guns. As a cultural activity, technology predates both science and engineering, each of which formalize some aspects of technological endeavor.
§Science, engineering and technology
The distinction between science, engineering and technology is not always clear. Science is the reasoned investigation or study of phenomena, aimed at discovering enduring principles among elements of the phenomenal world by employing formaltechniques such as the scientific method.[15] Technologies are not usually exclusively products of science, because they have to satisfy requirements such as utility, usability and safety.
Engineering is the goal-oriented process
of designing and making tools and systems to exploit natural phenomena
for practical human means, often (but not always) using results and
techniques from science. The development of technology may draw upon
many fields of knowledge, including scientific, engineering, mathematical, linguistic, and historical knowledge, to achieve some practical result.
Technology is often a consequence of science and engineering — although
technology as a human activity precedes the two fields. For example,
science might study the flow of electrons in electrical conductors,
by using already-existing tools and knowledge. This new-found knowledge
may then be used by engineers to create new tools and machines, such assemiconductors, computers,
and other forms of advanced technology. In this sense, scientists and
engineers may both be considered technologists; the three fields are
often considered as one for the purposes of research and reference.[16]
The exact relations between science and technology in particular have
been debated by scientists, historians, and policymakers in the late
20th century, in part because the debate can inform the funding of basic
and applied science. In the immediate wake of World War II,
for example, in the United States it was widely considered that
technology was simply "applied science" and that to fund basic science
was to reap technological results in due time. An articulation of this
philosophy could be found explicitly in Vannevar Bush's treatise on postwar science policy, Science—The Endless Frontier:
"New products, new industries, and more jobs require continuous
additions to knowledge of the laws of nature ... This essential new
knowledge can be obtained only through basic scientific research." In
the late-1960s, however, this view came under direct attack, leading
towards initiatives to fund science for specific tasks (initiatives
resisted by the scientific community). The issue remains
contentious—though most analysts resist the model that technology simply
is a result of scientific research.[17][18]
§History
Main articles: History of technology, Timeline of historic inventions and Timeline of electrical and electronic engineering
§Paleolithic (2.5 million YA – 10,000 BC)
Further information: Outline of prehistoric technology
The use of tools by early humans was partly a process of discovery and of evolution. Early humans evolved from a species offoraging hominids which were already bipedal,[19] with a brain mass approximately one third of modern humans.[20] Tool use remained relatively unchanged for most of early human history. Approximately 50,000 years ago, the use of tools andcomplex set of behaviors emerged, believed by many archaeologists to be connected to the emergence of fully modernlanguage.[21]
§Stone tools
Human ancestors have been using stone and other tools since long before the emergence of Homo sapiens approximately 200,000 years ago.[22] The earliest methods of stone tool making, known as the Oldowan "industry", date back to at least 2.3 million years ago,[23] with the earliest direct evidence of tool usage found in Ethiopia within the Great Rift Valley, dating back to 2.5 million years ago.[24] This era of stone tool use is called the Paleolithic, or "Old stone age", and spans all of human history up to the development of agriculture approximately 12,000 years ago.
To make a stone tool, a "core" of hard stone with specific flaking properties (such as flint) was struck with a hammerstone.
This flaking produced a sharp edge on the core stone as well as on the
flakes, either of which could be used as tools, primarily in the form ofchoppers or scrapers.[25] These tools greatly aided the early humans in their hunter-gatherer lifestyle to perform a variety of tasks including butchering carcasses (and breaking bones to get at the marrow); chopping wood; cracking open nuts; skinning an animal for its hide; and even forming other tools out of softer materials such as bone and wood.[26]
The earliest stone tools were crude, being little more than a fractured rock. In the Acheulian era, beginning approximately 1.65 million years ago, methods of working these stone into specific shapes, such as hand axes emerged. The Middle Paleolithic, approximately 300,000 years ago, saw the introduction of the prepared-core technique, where multiple blades could be rapidly formed from a single core stone.[25] The Upper Paleolithic, beginning approximately 40,000 years ago, saw the introduction of pressure flaking, where a wood, bone, or antler punch could be used to shape a stone very finely.[27]
§Fire
Main article: Control of fire by early humans
The discovery and utilization of fire, a simple energy source with many profound uses, was a turning point in the technological evolution of humankind.[28] The exact date of its discovery is not known; evidence of burnt animal bones at the Cradle of Humankindsuggests that the domestication of fire occurred before 1,000,000 BC;[29] scholarly consensus indicates that Homo erectus had controlled fire by between 500,000 BC and 400,000 BC.[30][31] Fire, fueled with wood and charcoal,
allowed early humans to cook their food to increase its digestibility,
improving its nutrient value and broadening the number of foods that
could be eaten.[32]
§Clothing and shelter
Other technological advances made during the Paleolithic era were clothing and
shelter; the adoption of both technologies cannot be dated exactly, but
they were a key to humanity's progress. As the Paleolithic era
progressed, dwellings became more sophisticated and more elaborate; as
early as 380,000 BC, humans were constructing temporary wood huts.[33][34] Clothing, adapted from the fur and hides of hunted animals, helped humanity expand into colder regions; humans began tomigrate out of Africa by 200,000 BC and into other continents, such as Eurasia.[35]
§Neolithic through classical antiquity (10,000 BC – 300 AD)
Man's technological ascent began in earnest in what is known as the Neolithic period ("New stone age"). The invention of polished stone axes was a major advance because it allowed forest clearance on a large scale to create farms. The discovery of agriculture allowed for the feeding of larger populations, and the transition to a sedentist lifestyle
increased the number of children that could be simultaneously raised,
as young children no longer needed to be carried, as was the case with
the nomadic lifestyle. Additionally, children could contribute labor to
the raising of crops more readily than they could to the hunter-gatherer
lifestyle.[36][37]
With this increase in population and availability of labor came an increase in labor specialization.[38] What triggered the progression from early Neolithic villages to the first cities, such as Uruk, and the first civilizations, such as Sumer, is not specifically known; however, the emergence of increasingly hierarchical social
structures, the specialization of labor, trade and war amongst adjacent
cultures, and the need for collective action to overcome environmental
challenges, such as the building of dikes and reservoirs, are all thought to have played a role.[39]
§Metal tools
Continuing improvements led to the furnace and bellows and provided the ability to smelt and forge native metals (naturally occurring in relatively pure form).[40] Gold,copper, silver, and lead,
were such early metals. The advantages of copper tools over stone,
bone, and wooden tools were quickly apparent to early humans, and native
copper was probably used from near the beginning of Neolithic times (about 8000 BC).[41] Native
copper does not naturally occur in large amounts, but copper ores are
quite common and some of them produce metal easily when burned in wood
or charcoal fires. Eventually, the working of metals led to the
discovery of alloyssuch as bronze and brass (about 4000 BC). The first uses of iron alloys such as steel dates to around 1400 BC.
§Energy and transport
Meanwhile, humans were learning to harness other forms of energy. The earliest known use of wind power is the sailboat.[42] The earliest record of a ship under sail is shown on an Egyptian pot dating back to 3200 BC.[43] From
prehistoric times, Egyptians probably used the power of the Nile annual
floods to irrigate their lands, gradually learning to regulate much of
it through purposely built irrigation channels and 'catch' basins.
Similarly, the early peoples of Mesopotamia, the Sumerians, learned to
use the Tigris and Euphrates rivers for much the same purposes. But more
extensive use of wind and water (and even human) power required another
invention.
According to archaeologists, the wheel was invented around 4000 B.C. probably independently and nearly simultaneously in Mesopotamia (in present-day Iraq), the Northern Caucasus (Maykop culture)
and Central Europe. Estimates on when this may have occurred range from
5500 to 3000 B.C., with most experts putting it closer to 4000 B.C. The
oldest artifacts with drawings that depict wheeled carts date from
about 3000 B.C.; however, the wheel may have been in use for millennia
before these drawings were made. There is also evidence from the same
period of time that wheels were used for the production of pottery.
(Note that the original potter's wheel was probably not a wheel, but
rather an irregularly shaped slab of flat wood with a small hollowed or
pierced area near the center and mounted on a peg driven into the earth.
It would have been rotated by repeated tugs by the potter or his
assistant.) More recently, the oldest-known wooden wheel in the world
was found in the Ljubljana marshes of Slovenia.[44]
The invention of the wheel revolutionized activities as disparate as
transportation, war, and the production of pottery (for which it may
have been first used). It did not take long to discover that wheeled
wagons could be used to carry heavy loads and fast (rotary) potters'
wheels enabled early mass production of pottery. But it was the use of
the wheel as a transformer of energy (through water wheels, windmills,
and even treadmills) that revolutionized the application of nonhuman
power sources.
§Medieval and modern history (300 AD – present)
Main articles: Medieval technology, Renaissance technology, Industrial Revolution, Second Industrial Revolution, Productivity improving technologies (historical)and Information Technology
Innovations continued through the Middle Ages with innovations such as silk, the horse collar and horseshoes in the first few hundred years after the fall of theRoman Empire. Medieval technology saw the use of simple machines (such as the lever, the screw, and the pulley) being combined to form more complicated tools, such as the wheelbarrow, windmills and clocks. The Renaissance brought forth many of these innovations, including the printing press (which facilitated the greater communication of knowledge), and technology became increasingly associated with science,
beginning a cycle of mutual advancement. The advancements in technology
in this era allowed a more steady supply of food, followed by the wider
availability of consumer goods.
Starting in the United Kingdom in the 18th century, the Industrial Revolution was a period of great technological discovery, particularly in the areas of agriculture, manufacturing, mining, metallurgy and transport, driven by the discovery of steam power. Technology later took another step with the harnessing of electricity to create such innovations as the electric motor, light bulb and countless others. Scientific advancement and the discovery of new concepts later allowed for powered flight, and advancements inmedicine, chemistry, physics and engineering. The rise in technology has led to the construction of skyscrapers and large cities whose inhabitants rely on automobiles or other powered transit for transportation. Communication was also greatly improved with the invention of the telegraph, telephone, radio and television. The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw a revolution in transportation with the invention of the steam-powered ship, train, airplane, and automobile.
The 20th century brought a host of innovations. In physics, the discovery of nuclear fissionhas led to both nuclear weapons and nuclear power. Computers were also invented and later miniaturized utilizing transistors and integrated circuits. The technology behind got called information technology, and these advancements subsequently led to the creation of the Internet, which ushered in the current Information Age. Humans have also been able to explore space with satellites (later used for telecommunication) and in manned missions going all the way to the moon. In medicine, this era brought innovations such as open-heart surgery and later stem cell therapy along with new medications and treatments. Complex manufacturingand construction techniques and organizations are needed to construct and maintain these new technologies, and entireindustries have
arisen to support and develop succeeding generations of increasingly
more complex tools. Modern technology increasingly relies on training
and education — their designers, builders, maintainers, and users often
require sophisticated general and specific training. Moreover, these
technologies have become so complex that entire fields have been created
to support them, includingengineering, medicine, and computer science, and other fields have been made more complex, such as construction, transportation and architecture.
§Philosophy
§Technicism
Generally, technicism is
a reliance or confidence in technology as a benefactor of society.
Taken to extreme, technicism is the belief that humanity will ultimately
be able to control the entirety of existence using technology. In other
words, human beings will someday be able to master all problems and
possibly even control the future using technology. Some, such as Stephen V. Monsma,[45] connect these ideas to the abdication of religion as a higher moral authority.
§Optimism
See also: Extropianism
Optimistic assumptions are made by proponents of ideologies such as transhumanism and singularitarianism, which view technological development as
generally having beneficial effects for the society and the human
condition. In these ideologies, technological development is morally
good. Some critics see these ideologies as examples of scientism and techno-utopianism and fear the notion of human enhancement and technological singularity which they support. Some have describedKarl Marx as a techno-optimist.[46]
§Skepticism and critics
On the somewhat skeptical side are certain philosophers like Herbert Marcuse and John Zerzan,
who believe that technological societies are inherently flawed. They
suggest that the inevitable result of such a society is to become
evermore technological at the cost of freedom and psychological health.
Many, such as the Luddites and prominent philosopher Martin Heidegger, hold serious, although not entirely deterministic reservations, about technology (see "The Question Concerning Technology"[47]). According to Heidegger scholars Hubert Dreyfus and
Charles Spinosa, "Heidegger does not oppose technology. He hopes to
reveal the essence of technology in a way that 'in no way confines us to
a stultified compulsion to push on blindly with technology or, what
comes to the same thing, to rebel helplessly against it.' Indeed, he
promises that 'when we once open ourselves expressly to the essence of
technology, we find ourselves unexpectedly taken into a freeing claim.'[48]"
What this entails is a more complex relationship to technology than
either techno-optimists or techno-pessimists tend to allow.[49]
Some of the most poignant criticisms of technology are found in what are
now considered to be dystopian literary classics, for example Aldous Huxley's Brave New World and other writings, Anthony Burgess's A Clockwork Orange, and George Orwell'sNineteen Eighty-Four. And, in Faust by Goethe,
Faust's selling his soul to the devil in return for power over the
physical world, is also often interpreted as a metaphor for the adoption
of industrial technology. More recently, modern works of science
fiction, such as those by Philip K. Dickand William Gibson, and films (e.g. Blade Runner, Ghost in the Shell) project highly ambivalent or cautionary attitudes toward technology's impact on human society and identity.
The late cultural critic Neil Postman distinguished
tool-using societies from technological societies and, finally, what he
called "technopolies," that is, societies that are dominated by the
ideology of technological and scientific progress, to the exclusion or
harm of other cultural practices, values and world-views.[50]
Darin Barney has written about technology's impact on practices of citizenship and
democratic culture, suggesting that technology can be construed as (1)
an object of political debate, (2) a means or medium of discussion, and
(3) a setting for democratic deliberation and citizenship. As a setting
for democratic culture, Barney suggests that technology tends to make ethical questions,
including the question of what a good life consists in, nearly
impossible, because they already give an answer to the question: a good
life is one that includes the use of more and more technology.[51]
Nikolas Kompridis has also written about the dangers of new technology, such as genetic engineering, nanotechnology, synthetic biology and robotics.
He warns that these technologies introduce unprecedented new challenges
to human beings, including the possibility of the permanent alteration
of our biological nature. These concerns are shared by other
philosophers, scientists and public intellectuals who have written about
similar issues (e.g. Francis Fukuyama, Jürgen Habermas, William Joy, and Michael Sandel).[52]
Another prominent critic of technology is Hubert Dreyfus, who has published books On the Internet and What Computers Still Can't Do.
Another, more infamous anti-technological treatise is Industrial Society and Its Future, written by Theodore Kaczynski (aka The Unabomber)
and printed in several major newspapers (and later books) as part of an
effort to end his bombing campaign of the techno-industrial
infrastructure.
§Appropriate technology
See also: Technocriticism and Technorealism
The notion of appropriate technology, however, was developed in the 20th century (e.g., see the work of E. F. Schumacher and of Jacques Ellul)
to describe situations where it was not desirable to use very new
technologies or those that required access to some centralized infrastructure or parts or skills imported from elsewhere. The eco-village movement emerged in part due to this concern.
§Competitiveness
In 1983 Project Socrates was initiated in the US intelligence community to
determine the source of declining US economic and military
competitiveness. Project Socrates concluded that technology exploitation
is the foundation of all competitive advantage and
that declining US competitiveness was from decision-making in the
private and public sectors switching from technology exploitation
(technology-based planning) to money exploitation (economic-based
planning) at the end of World War II.
Technology is properly defined as any application of science to
accomplish a function. The science can be leading edge or well
established and the function can have high visibility or be
significantly more mundane but it is all technology, and its
exploitation is the foundation of all competitive advantage.
Technology-based planning is what was used to build the US industrial giants before WWII (e.g., Dow, DuPont, GM) and it what was used to transform the US into a superpower. It was not economic-based planning.
Project Socrates determined that to rebuild US competitiveness, decision
making throughout the US had to readopt technology-based planning.
Project Socrates also determined that countries like China and India had
continued executing technology-based (while the US took its detour into
economic-based) planning, and as a result had considerably advanced the
process and were using it to build themselves into superpowers. To
rebuild US competitiveness the US decision-makers needed to adopt a form
of technology-based planning that was far more advanced than that used
by China and India.
Project Socrates determined that technology-based planning makes an
evolutionary leap forward every few hundred years and the next
evolutionary leap, the Automated Innovation Revolution, was poised to
occur. In the Automated Innovation Revolution the process for
determining how to acquire and utilize technology for a competitive
advantage (which includes R&D) is automated so that it can be
executed with unprecedented speed, efficiency and agility.